ORIGINAL PAPER
Multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey (Physical Education and Sports School)
2
Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey (Faculty of Sports Science)
3
Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey (Physical Education and Sports School)
4
Warsaw School of Economics, Warszawa, Poland (Collegium of World Economy, Department of Tourism)
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sema Can   

Hitit University, Physical Education and Sports School, Ulukavak Mh. 19040 Çorum, Turkey
Online publication date: 2016-08-30
 
Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2016;29(6):937–945
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers. Material and Methods: Fifty healthy women (age (mean ± standard deviation): 34.8±5.9 years, body height: 158±0.4 cm, body weight: 61.8±7.5 kg, body mass index: 24.6±2.7 kg/m2) workers from the same workplace volunteered to participate in the study. Physical activity was measured with the 7-day Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire (7-d PAAQ), an objective multi-sensor armband tool, and also a waist-mounted pedometer, which were both worn for 7 days. Results: A significant correlation between step numbers measured by armband and pedometer was observed (r = 0.735), but the step numbers measured by these 2 methods were significantly different (10 941±2236 steps/ day and 9170±2377 steps/day, respectively; p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between the value of 7-d PAAQ total energy expenditure and the value of armband total energy expenditure (r = 0.394, p = 0.005). However, total energy expenditure values measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (2081±370 kcal/ day and 2084±197 kcal/day, respectively; p = 0.96). In addition, physical activity levels (average daily metabolic equivalents (MET)) measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (1.45±0.12 MET/day and 1.47±0.24 MET/day, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the correlation between pedometer and armband measurements was higher than that between armband measurements and 7-d PAAQ selfreports. Our results suggest that none of the assessment methods examined here, 7-d PAAQ, pedometer, or armband, is sufficient when used as a single tool for physical activity level determination. Therefore, multi-instrument assessment methods are preferable. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2016;29(6):937–945
eISSN:1896-494X
ISSN:1232-1087