ORIGINAL PAPER
Do workers’ health surveillance
examinations fulfill their occupational
preventive objective? Analysis of the medical practice
of occupational physicians in Catalonia, Spain
More details
Hide details
1
University of Girona, Catalonia, Spain
(School of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences)
2
Integrated Baix Empordà Health Services, Palamós, Girona, Spain
(Occupational Health Service)
3
Ministry of Enterprise and Labour, Government of Catalonia, Spain
(Occupational Health and Safety Institute)
4
University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
(School of Medicine, Department of Public Health)
5
University of Girona, Catalonia, Spain
(School of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, TransLab Research Group)
6
Open University of Catalonia, Catalonia, Spain
(Health Sciences Studies)
Online publication date: 2017-09-11
Corresponding author
Mari Cruz Rodríguez-Jareño
University of Girona, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Emili Grahit 77, 17071 Girona, Spain
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017;30(6):823-48
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Although routine workers’ health examinations are extensively performed worldwide with important resource
allocation, few studies have analyzed their quality. The objective of this study has been to analyze the medical practice of
workers’ health examinations in Catalonia (Spain) in terms of its occupational preventive aim. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out by means of an online survey addressed to occupational physicians who were members
of the Catalan Society of Safety and Occupational Medicine. The questionnaire included factual questions on how
they performed health examinations in their usual practice. The bivariate analysis of the answers was performed by type
of occupational health service (external/internal). Results: The response rate was 57.9% (N = 168), representing 40.3% of
the reference population. A high percentage of occupational physicians had important limitations in their current medical
practice, including availability of clinical and exposure information, job-specificity of tests, and early detection and appropriate management of suspected occupational diseases. The situation in external occupational health services – that
covered the great majority of Catalan employees – was worse remarkably in regard to knowledge of occupational and nonoccupational
sickness absence data, participation in the investigation of occupational injuries and diseases, and accessibility
for workers to the occupational health service. Conclusions: This study raises serious concerns about the occupational
preventive usefulness of these health examinations, and subsequently about our health surveillance system, based primarily
on them. Professionals alongside health and safety institutions and stakeholders should promote the rationalization of
this system, following the technical criteria of need, relevance, scientific validity and effectiveness, whilst ensuring that its
ultimate goal of improving the health and safety of workers in relation to work is fulfilled. Other countries with similar
surveillance systems might be encouraged by our results to assess how their practices fit the intended purpose. Int J Occup
Med Environ Health 2017;30(6):823–848