ORIGINAL PAPER
Individual and occupational correlates of work ability of Polish employees with visual impairments
More details
Hide details
1
Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
(Department of Psychosocial Rehabilitation)
2
University of Opole, Opole, Poland
(Institute of Psychology)
Online publication date: 2026-04-24
HIGHLIGHTS
- Polish employees with visual impairment generally report good work ability.
- Income satisfaction and good health predict higher work ability.
- Additional disabilities and shift work increase the risk of reduced work ability.
- Targeted support is needed to enhance work ability in low-vision workers.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Although occupational activity is a key determinant of human well-being, labor market participation among people with visual impairments
remains low. While barriers to employment for individuals with low vision or blindness have been explored, little is known about how they
perceive their own work ability. This study therefore aimed to assess the level of work ability in this population in Poland and identify its correlates,
using the person-environment fit model as a theoretical framework. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among
67 participants with visual impairments, of whom 41 were partially sighted and 60% were women. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic,
health, disability, and job-related information, as well as data on social support from colleagues and supervisors (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire).
A dependent variable was measured with the Work Ability Index. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression
analyses were performed. Results: Participants reported a generally good level of work ability (M±SD 37.54±6.46). Correlation analysis identified 5
variables significantly associated with work ability. In the regression model, 4 remained significant predictors: satisfaction with household income
(β = 0.34, p < 0.001), self-rated health (β = 0.27, p < 0.01), presence of additional disability (β = –0.22, p < 0.01), and shift work (β = –0.23, p < 0.05).
The model explained 62% of the variance in work ability (R² = 0.62). Additional analyses indicated that the examined variables explained more variance
in the subjective-resource component of WAI than in its objective health component. Conclusions: The findings highlight key personal and occupational
factors shaping work ability among employees with visual impairments. Considering these factors in workplace interventions may help
sustain employment and promote occupational well-being in this group. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2026;39(2)