ORIGINAL PAPER
Occupational stress and musculoskeletal symptoms in firefighters
More details
Hide details
1
American Medical Center, Nicosia, Cyprus
(Department of Occupational Medicine)
2
Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
(Department of Environmental Health, Environmental and Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology (EOME))
3
University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
(Department of Psychology)
4
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
(School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Centre for Organizational Health and Development)
Online publication date: 2019-03-29
Corresponding author
Elpidoforos S. Soteriades
American Medical Center, Department of Occupational Medicine, 215 Spyrou Kyprianou Ave., 2047 Strovolos, Nicosia,
Cyprus
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(3):341-52
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential association between occupational stress and musculoskeletal symptoms in firefighters. Material and Methods: Data were collected among Cypriot firefighters through a battery of adapted questionnaires completed anonymously. Results: A total of 430 firefighters (a response rate of 68%) completed the survey (the age range: 21–60 years). A total of 11% of firefighters reported
moderate to extremely severe stress through the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. A total of 40% of
firefighters reported musculoskeletal symptoms, the most frequent being back pain. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models showed that
occupational stress was associated with a 50% higher risk of musculoskeletal symptoms in firefighters after adjusting for age, smoking and obesity
(OR = 1.52, p = 0.04). In addition, a positive dose-response relationship was found between occupational stress and musculoskeletal symptoms. Conclusions: Occupational stress constitutes a significant risk for firefighters and is associated with higher prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms
at work. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(3):341–52