ORIGINAL PAPER
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and assessment of epidemiologic determinants in Portuguese municipal workers
More details
Hide details
1
University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
(Faculty of Medicine)
2
University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
(MEDCIDS – Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine)
3
CINTESIS – Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal
4
University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
(IPATIMUP, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology)
5
University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
(Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine)
Online publication date: 2022-02-07
Corresponding author
Nuno Barros Ferreira
University of Porto, Faculty of Medicine, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(3):297-307
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in municipal employees of Northern Portugal during the first pandemic wave (May–June 2020) and its association with potentially related risk factors for infection. Material and Methods: The authors assessed municipal employees
of 2 cities in Northern Portugal, in whom serological tests to SARS-CoV-2 and an epidemiological survey were applied. The authors assessed
the proportion of individuals presenting IgM and/or IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, and evaluated the association between having positive serological
test results, epidemiologic variables and clinical presentations. Reported symptoms were evaluated on their sensitivity, specificity, and predictive
values. Results: The authors assessed 1696 employees, of whom 22.0% were firefighters, 10.4% were police officers, 10.3% were maintenance workers,
and 8.1% were administrative assistants. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 2.9% (95% CI: 2.1–3.7%). Administrative assistants
comprised the professional group with highest seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 1.9 in the comparison with other occupational groups, 95% CI:
0.8–4.3, p = 0.126). The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among those who were in direct contact with COVID-19 patients in their professional
activity was 3.9%, compared to 2.7% among those who were not in direct contact with such patients (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.8–2.8, p = 0.222).
The highest risk of infection was associated with the presence of a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the household (OR = 17.4, 95% CI: 8.3–36.8,
p < 0.001). Living with a healthcare professional was not associated with a higher risk of infection (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.4–2.5, p = 0.934). Anosmia/
dysgeusia was the symptom with the highest positive predictive value (52.2%, 95% CI: 31.8–72.6, p < 0.001) and specificity (99.3%, 95% CI: 98.9–99.7,
p < 0.001), while cough was the most prevalent symptom among SARS-CoV-2 seropositive participants (36%). Conclusions: The authors observed
a SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence of 2.9% among assessed municipal employees. Anosmia/dysgeusia was the COVID-19 symptom which displayed
the highest positive predictive value and specificity. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(3):297–307