ORIGINAL PAPER
Validation of the Study Burnout Inventory and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory for the use among medical students
More details
Hide details
1
University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
(Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine)
2
University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
(Faculty of Medicine)
3
University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
(Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Social Medicine)
4
University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
(Faculty of Medicine, Chair for Social Medicine and Health Statistics with Informatics)
5
Institute of Public Health of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
6
University of Nis, Nis, Serbia
(Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine and Hygiene with Medical Ecology)
7
University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
(Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Stomatology)
8
University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
(Faculty of Medicine, Department of Humanities)
9
University of Pristina – Kosovska Mitrovica, Kosovska Mitovica, Serbia
(School of Medicine, Department for Preventive Medicine)
10
University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
(Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Physiology)
Online publication date: 2021-05-26
Corresponding author
Zorica Terzic-Supic
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine, dr Subotica 15, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(6):737-45
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Serbian versions of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) and
the Study Burnout Inventory (SBI) among fifth-year medical students at 5 universities in Serbia. Material and Methods: The study included 573 fifthyear
medical students at 5 universities in Serbia. The research instrument consisted of SBI and CBI. The reliability of these instruments was assessed
using an internal consistency measure (Cronbach’s α), an intra-class coefficient (ICC) and factor analysis. Results: Cronbach’s α for SBI was 0.83,
including for exhaustion 0.73, for cynicism 0.70, and for inadequacy 0.48. The test-retest reliability (ICC) was 0.75. Cronbach’s α for personal burnout
on CBI was 0.89, for the faculty-related burnout 0.86, and for the faculty-members-related burnout 0.92. Cronbach’s α for CBI was 0.93. The factor
analysis for SBI showed 2 factors and for CBI 3 factors. Conclusions: This study revealed that the Serbian versions of both SBI and CBI could be used
for the assessment of burnout in this population. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(6):737–45