ORIGINAL PAPER
Sources of healthcare workers’ COVID‑19 infections and related safety guidelines
Lotta-Maria A.H. Oksanen 1, 2  
,   Enni Sanmark 1, 2
,   Sampo A. Oksanen 3, 4
,   Veli-Jukka Anttila 1, 5
,   Jussi J. Paterno 6, 7
,   Maija Lappalainen 1, 8
,   Lasse Lehtonen 1, 8
,   Ahmed Geneid 1, 2
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (Faculty of Medicine)
2
Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics – Head and Neck Surgery)
3
Nordic Healthcare Group, Helsinki, Finland
4
Aalto University School of Business, Espoo, Finland
5
Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (HUS Inflammation Center)
6
Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland (Department of Ophthalmology)
7
University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland (Faculty of Medicine)
8
Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB)
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Lotta-Maria A.H. Oksanen   

Helsinki University Hospital Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics – Head and Neck Surgery, Maistraatinportti 2, PO Box 250, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
Online publication date: 2021-04-06
 
Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2021;34(2):239–249
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of safety guidelines in the workplace, the authors analyzed the work-related exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and the source of COVID‑19 infections among healthcare workers (HCWs), together with the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Material and Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted in tertiary hospitals in the Uusimaa region, Finland, with 1072 volunteers being enrolled in the study from among the HCWs at the Helsinki University Hospital. Overall, 866 (80.8%) HCWs (including 588 nurses, 170 doctors, and 108 laboratory and medical imaging nurses) completed the questionnaire by July 15, 2020, with 52% of the participants taking care of COVID‑19 patients. The participants answered a structured questionnaire regarding their use of PPE, the ability to follow safety guidelines, exposure to COVID‑19, and the source of potential COVID‑19 infections. The participants with COVID‑19 symptoms were tested with the SARS-CoV-2 realtime polymerase chain reaction method. All infected participants were contacted, and their answers were confirmed regarding COVID‑19 exposure. Results: In total, 41 (4.7%) participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 22 (53.6%) of infections being confirmed or likely occupational, and 12 (29.3%) originating from colleagues. In 14 cases (63.6%), occupational infections occurred while using a surgical mask, and all infections originating from patients occurred while using a surgical mask or no mask at all. No occupational infections were found while using an FFP2/3 respirator and following aerosol precautions. The combined odds ratio for working at an intensive care unit, an emergency department, or a ward was 3.4 (95% CI: 1.2–9.2, p = 0.016). Conclusions: A high infection rate was found among HCWs despite safety guidelines. Based on these findings, the authors recommend the use of FFP2/3 respirators in all patient contacts with confirmed or suspected COVID‑19, along with the use of universal masking, also in personnel rooms. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(2):239–49
eISSN:1896-494X
ISSN:1232-1087